![]() ![]() The focus is on language emanating from the US, and the book links this language to specific examples of changed detention practices from the US, Canada, and the UK. It then critiques political arguments that began after 9/11, many of which are still foundational as terrorism detention practices evolve. It introduces this idea by presenting current examples, such as some of the language used by US President Donald Trump regarding terrorism, and it argues that such language has supported questionable legal responses to terrorism. This book suggests that biased political discourse has, in some respects, continued to fuel public misconceptions about terrorism, which have then led to problematic legal enactments, supported by those misconceptions. It specifically links aspects of that discourse to problematic and evolving terrorism detention practices that happen outside of traditional criminal and wartime paradigms, with examples including the detentions at Guantanamo Bay and security certificates in Canada. ![]() The focus of this book is on the manner in which strategic discourse has been used to create accepted political narratives. Detention of Terrorism Suspects Book Review:Ĭontroversial erosions of individual liberties in the name of anti-terrorism are ongoing in liberal democracies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |